Johanna: Even though the recording was shorter than the other ones due to technical problems, Johanna was more accurate and fluent at the same time. She has overcome the Subject + Verb agreement and she uses more regular and irregular verbs correctly.
Example:
• I went to the shopping center and I bought some things and some food and some clothes, when I was paying in the cashier, the clerk undercharged me.
Fabiola barely spoke during this conversation due to time constraints and technical problems. However, she was highly accurate in both affirmative as well as in asking questions. She did not use any negative statements in this conversation.
Examples:
• And how much did you receive?
• The majority of men was more opportunity for to promote or a better job or for a better area.
Definitively, Andres’s learning process in terms of improving the use of the past tenses during the implementation process show strong signs of fossilization. This shows that a negative attitude and lack of autonomy had a direct influence in Andres's final learning outcome. Gabriel also noticed what I did.
Andres did not comply with all his homework assignments and he did not use the course’s learning community in order to do some independent work.
Diana did not only suffer a backslide but she also seems to have stagnated in terms of accuracy. She only used some verbs in past tenses, she missed out all of the auxiliary verbs in past when she asked some questions and she did not organize her ideas accordingly. Mayi noticed that Diana was not being accurate when she asked questions
Claudia is still struggling in implementing the new irregular verbs into her conversations, but she has improved in constructing negative statements though Fabiola thinks she did a great job in this.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.